The
Ferndale Record ran an article (10/9/2013) on the Ferndale City Council
Forum sponsored by the Ferndale Chamber of Commerce. As would be
expected, it was not a verbatim account of what was said, therein lies a
problem. The article leaves one with the impression that the
candidates were all pretty much on a par. For me this was anything but
the case.
What I
witnessed greatly influenced my assessment of
candidate performance in the forum. Here are three examples. One
candidate appeared so overwhelmed by his presence before the public as
to be virtually incapable of putting together complete sentences.
Another candidate, spoke in such blue sky academic political
philosophical speak, that I found my self almost gasping for air. Yet
another was glib enough to answer a question with “What he said”.
It
generally goes without saying that local elections rarely generate the
much public interest. This was evident in the rather limited turn out
for the forum. The bulk of the audience appeared to be, I can only
assume, high school civics students. In total, I doubt that there were
fewer than 50 people in attendance , though I made no effort to count
them, nor apparently did the Record reporter.
Given that there will likely be very few additional opportunities for
the public to actually hear from most of the candidates, as well as the
low attendance at the forum, it seems even more important that the
Record coverage provide more than a sanitized selective summation of the
candidates responses.
I
don’t envy the reporters task in trying to report about this event. It
is impractical to report every word spoken. Lay upon that the
presumption that reporting only be factual and value neutral and you’ve
got a real problem. In spite of those things, I believe that The
Ferndale Record, should have more accurately reflected/characterized the
performance of the candidates on the forum.
The
performance of candidates in this forum contained real information that
should be available to the public. The Ferndale Record has, I believe,
a responsibility to the public to do some critical performance
assessment. If it couldn’t include it in the article then an attendant
editorial would have been appropriate.
No comments:
Post a Comment